Why Do So Many Christians Give Unconditional Support to the State of Israel?

In conservative American Christianity, many Christians and churches give near-unconditional support to the modern state of Israel.

Why is this happening? Why do Christians feel such an unparalleled, strong obligation toward a foreign nation? Why Israel and not China, Zimbabwe, or France? Some people suggest that Christians have been persuaded by political lobbying, media influence, or pro-Israel advocacy groups.

While those influences certainly exist, they do not explain the true source.

The primary reason for such strong Christian support for Israel is theological, not political.

More specifically, it is rooted in a system of biblical interpretation called dispensationalism.

The Forgotten Influence of Dispensationalism

Many Christians today have never even heard the word “dispensationalism,” yet they have inherited many of its assumptions. Even people who strongly hold the tenets of dispensationalism are not even aware of it! Many assume it is simply the clear teaching of the Bible, and what is universally held by Christians.

In the twentieth century dispensationalism became one of the dominant theological systems within American evangelicalism. 

At its core, dispensationalism teaches that God has two distinct peoples with two distinct programs:

  1. Israel
  2. The Church

According to this view, God’s promises and covenants to ethnically Jewish people — and by extension the modern state of Israel — remain strictly separate from His promises to Christ and his Church. In that view, God has entered into an everlasting, unconditional covenant whereby Jewish people/Israel is vouchsafed by God a promised land (Israel), great prosperity, blessing and global authority/power. This has not been fulfilled yet, so the anticipation is that this is still to be fulfilled in our future. 

This sharp distinction between Israel and the Church is the main foundational assumption that shapes how dispensationalists view Jewish people today, the state of Israel and modern current events. 

The Abrahamic Covenant and Modern Israel

The key biblical text is Genesis 12:3 where God made a promise to Abraham:

“I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee.”

Dispensationalists generally understand this promise as applying first to Abraham, then to his son Isaac, then to his grandson Jacob (who was renamed “Israel” by God), and then by extension directly to all ethnically Jewish people today, and ultimately to the collection of Jewish people in the modern state of Israel.

The practical conclusion often becomes:

  • Bless Jewish people/the state of Israel and God will bless you. 
  • Oppose Jewish people/the state of Israel and God will oppose you.
  • America must support Israel politically and militarily. It’s an honor for even Americans to join the IDF to fight with “God’s people.”
  • We must strongly avoid criticizing or in any way opposing Israel’s actions, since God Himself is backing their efforts.

Genesis 12:3 has often been transformed into a foreign policy principle: nations prosper when they support Israel and are judged when they oppose Israel. Period.

As a result, many Christians have come to view support for Israel not merely as a political preference but as a biblical obligation. 

Is the Modern State of Israel the Same Thing as Biblical Israel?

This is the crux of the whole matter.  

When God made promises to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and their descendants, did he ultimately have in mind a future secular democratic nation established in 1948?

The answer is…No. The modern state of Israel contains believers, unbelievers, secular Jews, atheists, Muslims, Christians, and people from many different backgrounds. Its government is a political institution like every other government in the world, not the ultimate eschatalogical fulfillment— the Hope of the World! 

God made his promise/covenant with Abraham who was a faithful follower of God. The covenantal blessings were not secured to all of Abraham’s physical children, but only to the ones who were faithful to God, as Abraham was. 

The New Testament makes it crystal clear that the covenant is ultimately, completely fulfilled in Abraham’s One descendant— Jesus, the Messiah, and then by extension to everyone who genuinely follows Jesus (Christians). 

Galatians 3:16, “Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “And to your Seed,” who is Christ.”  

Galatians 3:29, “And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”

So, who or what is the true Israel today? It is Jesus Christ and Christians (Jewish and Non-Jewish believers in Christ). 

When we bless Jesus and his faithful followers (Christians), then God will bless us. If we curse or oppose Jesus and his faithful followers (Christians), then God will oppose us.

Even if one believes God still has future purposes for ethnic Jews, it does not automatically follow that every action of the modern Israeli government is just and should be supported by Christians. The Bible is full of times where God himself criticizes the nation of Israel, her kings, priests, prophets and national policies. The true prophets definitely rebuked Israel more than they defended her. In fact, a definitive feature of true prophets throughout the Biblical era was that they were critical of Israel, hated and oftentimes killed by them.  

If criticizing and opposing Israel’s government was not forbidden for Isaiah, Jeremiah, Jesus, or the apostles, why should it be frowned upon today? Christians should be the first ones to stand up in support for Jewish people and the state of Israel— when they are doing what is right — but if they are acting corruptly, then Christians should be the first ones to stand up and say something as well. 

Romans 2:8-11, “…but to those who are self-seeking and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness—indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish, on every soul of man who does evil, to the Jew first and also to the Greek; but glory, honor, and peace to everyone who works what is good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For there is no partiality with God.

Loving Jewish People Is Not the Same as Supporting Every Policy of Israel

One of the unfortunate consequences of this discussion is that disagreement is often treated as hostility. Disagreeing with dispensationalism does not in any way make you anti-semitic. 

A Christian may:

  • Love and serve Jewish people.
  • Oppose antisemitism. 
  • Support Israel’s right to exist.
  • Pray for peace and safety for its citizens.
  • And still believe that Jewish people should be treated the same as any other ethnicity of people.
  • And still believe that the Israeli government, like every government, should be evaluated biblically.

Christians regularly criticize and oppose their own American government, as well as other nations around the world. Israel should be no different. 

There is one nation, or one people, that God has a special eye on, that Christians ought to have fierce allegiance to, and that is the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of all Kings, and his people— the Church. Even there, the Church still deserves criticism when it is called for, as well as opposition when she opposes Christ Himself and his laws. But the real, Biblical way to understand Genesis 12:3 is this, “I will bless those that bless (Jesus and His people) and I will curse those who curse (Jesus and His people). So, let’s bless, obey and follow Jesus and show no partiality to any ethnic group or political nation. 

Misunderstanding Replacement Theology

There are many voices out there right now speaking against “Replacement Theology.” I have noticed many misunderstandings and errors in these talks and thought it would be helpful to clarify a few of the major ones. My main concern in posting this is to urge for understanding, which will hopefully lead to more unity in the Body of Christ. Make sure you know exactly what INDIVIDUALS believe by asking THEM, instead of assuming what they believe based on a broad category someone else lumped them into.  

  1. Most proponents of “Replacement Theology” do not think that the Church has replaced Israel. They don’t think that God disinherited Israel, took away the promises pertaining to them and gave them to the Church. Rather, they think that God indeed fulfilled his promises to Israel in Jesus the Jewish Messiah and in the remnant believers of the congregation (assembly/church) of Israel. Joseph, Mary, Peter, John, Paul were all Jews. They were also the charter members of the New Testament Church. The faithful of ethnic, political Israel became the Church, the true, eternal spiritual Israel. The promises of God flowed like a single river from Abraham to Jesus, but when Jesus came the river burst out into many branches and spread around the world. There is only one river of God’s promises. There is only one People of God, not two. There is only one Olive Tree, not two. There is only one Congregation (Church), not two. There is only one New Covenant, not two. Therefore, “Replacement Theologians” prefer titles like “Fulfillment Theology” or “Expansion Theology,” which emphasize God truly keeping his promises to Israel and to a cohesion between Israel and the Church, rather than a severe division between the two.     
  1. Barely any “Replacement Theologians” are anti-semitic. You probably wouldn’t get that impression from most of these talks against “Replacement Theology.”  There are extremes in every theological camp, so yes anti-semitism does exist out there amongst them. However, among those who gladly claim to be Bible-Believing, Evangelical, Born Again Christians, I haven’t heard any anti-Jewishness, rather only love for Jews and gratitude for the special place they hold in Redemptive history. It is granted that those who hold to what is called “Replacement Theology” typically do not support Jews or the state of Israel unconditionally. They would say that if a Jew is being evil or the nation of Israel is engaging in unjust activities it should be called out and not supported. Basically, we should treat Jews and the nation of Israel with the same level of respect and accountability that we would to any other people or nation. This is contrasted to a Dispensationalists approach, which tends to favorably support Jews and the nation of Israel regardless of their actions. The motto tends to lean more in the direction of “I Stand With Israel…No Matter What.” Whereas most “Replacement Theologians” would think something more like, “I Stand With Israel…So Long As They Stand On The Side Of God.”  
  1. Most “Replacement Theologians” are staunch supporters of Biblical Inerrancy and the Literal approach to Bible Interpretation. It is a misrepresentation to say that “Replacement Theologians” interpret the Bible allegorically and Dispensationalists literally. Both do both, it’s just a matter of degree. Dispensationalists do not think Jesus is literally a wooden door, but take that as symbolic language. “Replacement Theologians” take the apostles literally when they say things like, “a Jew is not one outwardly in the flesh but inwardly in the spirit (Rom. 2)” meaning: being truly Jewish is not an ethnic reality, but a spiritual reality; or “If you belong to Christ then you are a child of Abraham and heir of the promise (Gal. 3)” or “they are not all Israel, which are of Israel (Rom. 9)” etc. Just because someone has a different understanding than yourself of certain passages doesn’t mean they are Bible deniers, unless you believe that all of your interpretations are infallible. 

Just as there are different forms (and cases of extremes) of every theology there are different forms of what is called “Replacement Theology.” Ask individuals what they believe. Then make sure to place the identity of Israel in it’s proper place of importance in the grand scheme of things. 

I hope this article was helpful to you. Please feel free to interact in the comments. Thank you for reading, Lee